9 November 2023
general impression
This round consisted largely of applications that approach housing issues from different perspectives. For instance, they look at alternative forms of housing such as the project on co-housing by design agency Shift architecture urbanism and the matching of care with housing in the Wolfheze’s Alternative project by bureau Ira Koers. Several projects look at the relationship between housing and climate issues through research into bio-based residential building, such as the project Kumiki biobased modelwoning by Architectenbureau Kumiki. Furthermore, typology crops up more frequently within this round’s applications with studies that take a critical approach to high-rise buildings in the current zeitgeist, as seen in the project Core Issues by design firm -C-A-S-.
Current issues are not only being investigated from the perspective of the housing question. The role of nature and its relationship to the planned environment, and how that changes over time, is being examined in a number of projects this round. For example, the project Humanity on the move by Bureauufo looks at the impact of climate change and also considers the changing role of water in relation to landscapes. By thinking differently about the role of nature, the use of resources and historical practices, applicants aim to draw lessons from underexposed knowledge.
diversity and inclusion
The contribution to diversity and inclusion within the field is one of the criteria on which applications are assessed. This round looks at experiences of queer people, among others, in nightlife, the influence of feminism on public housing and housing construction from the 1960s onwards. The Harriët Freezer Street project by Charlie Koolhaas is a case in point. In addition, there is a focus on the role of non-human life and the voice of nature within architecture in the project New Horizon Initiative by Dirk-Jan Visser and Rechten voor Nationaal Park Eiland van Brienenoord by Stichting Grondvesten.
selection
The available budget was not sufficient to award a grant to all 28 positively assessed applications. As a result, the advisory committee had to prioritize. The procedure used is described in the Architecture Grant Scheme. After prioritization, 2 positively assessed projects were eliminated from the selection.
A few notable projects from this round’s selection are: