13 July 2023
general impression
An interesting trend can be seen in the submitted projects: investigating the past as a source of new insights for the future. Existing assumptions are questioned or redefined, or the forgotten aspects are instead given renewed attention in the light of our current zeitgeist. These developments can be seen, for example, in projects relating to 30 years’ exhibition design, housing complexes for single women in Amsterdam, the role of video stores within our cities and the substantive analysis of the Wadden area. It is interesting to reflect on the lessons learnt from successful projects, for instance by analyzing and sharing solutions to address current housing issues. By focusing on social issues, these projects contribute to a sustainable and inclusive future. The multifaceted architectural projects reflect not only the continuous evolution of the discipline, but also the growing awareness of the role architecture plays in our society. The projects inspire creative solutions where the built environment contributes to the well-being of individuals and communities.
The contribution to diversity and inclusion within the field is one of the criteria on which applications are assessed. Themes such as gender equality and the position of women within architecture come up regularly in this round. There is also a focus on involving under-represented groups to increase community engagement and public outreach. For instance, in the projects A Room for Yourself by Laura Lubbers and Border Ecologies and the Gaza Strip. Watermelon, Sardines, Crabs, Sand, and Sediment by FAST, Foundation for Achieving Seamless Territory. Each project deals with this in a different way. In some projects, multiperspectivity is the substantive theme, while in others this is contributed to by creating diversity among collaboration partners and the intended audience.
selection
The available budget of € 400,000 was not sufficient to award a grant to all 38 positively assessed applications. As a result, the advisory committee had to prioritize. The procedure used is described in the Architecture Grant Scheme. After prioritization, 15 positively assessed projects were eliminated from the selection.
A few notable projects from this round’s selection are: